KiNK interview

https://i0.wp.com/www.residentadvisor.net/images/features/2010/ml-kink-list.jpg

read interview

Machine love: KiNKClassic Chicago house by way of Sofia. RA discovers the surprising method behind the sound and style of Bulgarian producer, KiNK. After plying his production trade out of Sofia, Bulgaria for the past ten years, it only took a couple of seconds for KiNK to go stellar. Although the producer, real name Strahil Velchev, had experienced reasonable amounts of success in tandem with UK producer Neville Watson and their releases for Rush Hour subsidiary Hour House Is Your Rush, it was (in my own mind at least) around the midpoint of his 2009-released track “Trevoga” that Velchev truly came into his own. As syncopated Todd Terry-esque snares buckled under strain of an interminable arpeggio line, there was a brief flash of stasis—as there is in all the best dance floor records—in which you didn’t know what the fuck was going to happen next. The track sat alongside a further pair of wonderfully wayward house jams on the Psyche Funk EP for the Undertones label, although much of Velchev’s prior and subsequent work has been an exploration of more traditional tropes.

Although by his own admission Velchev’s output in 2010 has been on the heavy side, few would argue that the impact of his work has waned as a result. His name lit up January DJ charts as he and Neville Watson turned in an intrepid dance floor re-touch of DJ Sprinkles’ “Masturjakor,” while liebe*detail, Freerange, Pets Recordings and Get Physical have all since etched “KiNK” into their remix credits. Given his propensity for all things acid and old school, perhaps the least surprising of Velchev’s numerous label homes was Josh Wink’s Ovum. The Rachel EP was as sweaty and retrospective as anything the label has emitted in its 15-year history. So with all this retroactive noise circulating, you could very reasonably deduce that Velchev’s classic sounds are mirrored in production process. Well, you’d be partially correct. I discovered that the truth was a little more intriguing than simply “hardware and analog” as I called up Velchev’s Sofia studio.

You told me that you had a few issues with your gear when I saw you in Panorama Bar for your live show?

Yeah, unfortunately. I bought two new controllers for my live act, and I haven’t got to test them enough in Sofia. I found out that there is some conflict between the two controllers. On the first track I tried to play, one of the controllers that is more important for the live act just stopped working, and I had to reset the software in order to activate the controller again. Then for the whole live set I was really careful, not doing much, just trying to keep the equipment going on. So I was not really happy, because I couldn’t be as active as I would be if the gear was 100% working… In some parts towards the end I did some stuff that was completely live without any prepared loops, but I was afraid to do it any longer because I was afraid the system would crash.

What do you use for live jamming?

I have a couple of options. For this particular live [set] I had to use Ableton Live with controllers. I do different kinds of gigs: I DJ, I do a live PA for two hours and I have a combination of DJ sets together with a hardware live act. For this live act in Panorama Bar I had to play live for two hours, and the only chance was to use the computer, because I could play my whole tracks—the promoters expect to hear the productions—and the only opportunity to do this is to use the computer where everything is pre-arranged.

The other kind of live I do is with some drum machines like the Vermona DRM. It’s not the new Vermona that’s being produced lately, it’s a very old drum machine with a TR-style sequencer that you can program some beats on in real time. So I usually bring this when I have a DJ set and when I have a chance to do a really short live set for 30 minutes. I also have a very small synthesizer called Nord Micro Modular, it can be assigned with the Vermona. Also I use a very funny Japanese toy called Gakken analog synthesizer.

Sequencer

What sort of sound do you get out of it?

It just has one waveform, which is a sawtooth waveform. I can actually switch it on. [demonstrates]

It sounds very 8-bit.

Yeah. It’s just one oscillator with a sawtooth waveform. It has attached LFO to the pitch of the waveform; it has good resonance, that’s it really. If you use it live together with some other basic setup it’s pretty cool. But you can’t really do a long live set with just with a simple drum machine and very basic synthesizers.

Do you actually enjoy playing live with Ableton?

I’m not really into the Live thing, because first of all I don’t use Ableton for production, and I’m not that familiar with the software. Of course, it’s very basic and very easy software to learn, but I don’t feel that free with Ableton compared to other guys who are using it all the time. Also, my tracks, the way I produce music is different. I run my tracks through tape, and I do some processing on the whole mix. It’s very hard for me to distribute the track on channels or loops. For other guys it’s very easy to render tracks on channels and put them on Ableton, or just use their Ableton project. For me, it’s really hard work to adapt every track for a live act.

I have to take it from my other software which is called Jeskola Buzz. It’s very strange modular software. It doesn’t have an option to render, you have to record. It doesn’t have offline export. So I have to record every channel one by one. Also there is some bug in the software. When you export something, the software adds some air in the beginning of the sample. And every time you export something, the air, this space is different. If you have all the channels, and you just place them on the software, they are not going to be in time, they are not going to be in sync… For me, preparing a full track for Ableton is a nightmare.

KiNK Studio

Could you explain how Buzz works to people who maybe aren’t familiar with it?

Let’s say it’s a kind of modular software. It’s kind of related to programmes like Reaktor, or Max/MSP. But it’s not as complex as those programmes. It doesn’t emulate a real hardware studio. You don’t have to use a mixer; you don’t have this interface that emulates the real machines. You just have simple blocks. In one of the views of this programme, you just have to imagine that you’re looking at the studio from the roof. You see some blue blocks that in the programme are called generators. Those blue blocks are, let’s say, the machines that are making the sound, synthesizers, samplers. There are other blocks that are pink, they are called effects, and they are effects like reverb, delay, equalization, dynamics effects, everything that you put the signal through.

Beside the modular fashion of the machine routing there is another interesting thing: Buzz is a “multiple pattern sequencer tracker” which means that the interface is very numeric. You add notes through the computer keyboard. You type commands to call effects or to control some kind of parameters using the hexadecimal numeral system. You don’t draw automation with your mouse, all you see in the Pattern/Sequencer views is points and numbers. And you type commands.

How do you find its sound quality?

I’m not sure if the sound quality of Buzz is good. For me it was always a problem to have a solid low end in the tracks… In my productions the sound quality is not the leading thing. The idea and the character, the design is most important for me. If I manage to transfer a great idea into an audio file, and if I manage to make a recording with special sound, I don’t care if the track is too quiet, the bass is too much or the hi-hats are too loud in some parts. I would sacrifice a good mix-down for a special sound.

When did you first start using it?

I started to use it in 1999, just because at that time I was struggling to start making music. I didn’t have money to buy hardware. Also, in Bulgaria, in our music stores we haven’t got those popular samplers or drum machines that are the basics for electronic music. So the only option for me was to start using a computer. In 1999 my first computer was a really basic machine, it was like 133 MHz. It was really slow. 16 MB of RAM. So I needed good software which I would be able to operate in real time, but at the same time I needed light software without big requirements. Buzz was this thing. It was very light, the interface was very ugly. It doesn’t need much RAM memory to calculate. That was the only reason to start with Buzz.

I later realized how powerful a platform it is. In 2002, I tried other programmes like Reason and Cubase. Later I tried Ableton when it wasn’t as advanced as it is now. And I just didn’t feel comfortable with having connections into the mixer that are not in front of my eyes.

Do you feel like having used Buzz for all these years has affected your sound?

I don’t think it affected my production, because the process I learned to make music was just to listen to my favourite music, and try and learn how to make it with Buzz. It definitely gave me freedom compared to the programmes which were available ten years ago when I started to spend more time in music production. So no, I think this software just gave me the freedom to make what was already in my mind.

KiNK Synths

I’ve seen the video you’ve put online of you and Neville Watson jamming. Is this an approach you often take to your tracks?

No, definitely not. That’s why when I gave you this gear list [pre-interview] I told you that I have an inspirational part of the studio which I use to enjoy when I make some sounds. And the other part of the studio is just my computer with the software.

Let’s say when I want to make a track, I think of the track when I am out with friends, or in bed when I am about to fall asleep. When I sit at the computer I already have some idea what I am going to do. I sit there, and I start to programme. It is a very cold process; it’s not really impulsive and emotional. The emotional process is before, when I walk outside and think about projects, or when I listen to other people’s music and like some sound.

So something like the Vermona drum machine will never feature in your tracks?

No, I’ve never used any hardware on my tracks. I learn what the behaviour of the hardware is. Later, on the computer, I emulate the behaviour. But I don’t go with the hardware and tweak live and record. That’s probably something I would like to do in the future, because the more I travel I have the chance to visit some great shops. For example when I was in Berlin I was in a very great shop called Schneider’s Buero, and I bought a very cool small analog synthesizer called MFB Synth II.

MFB

I’ll probably think of a separate project, which will be made totally live with this gear. But it’s for the future. So far for my production it’s thinking before and then sitting at a computer doing it with a clean mind—without being affected by something, without emotion in the moment when I am writing the tracks.

Basically how I make music: if it’s going to be a dance track I make the basic loop with all the elements. I make a loop which I imagine is the stronger part of the track. Then I just copy the loop in the sequencer, and start to remove some elements. So when I have this strong loop I stand up and imagine that I am in the club. I start to tweak the controllers and do this live thing. I dance a little bit, and I try to feel the track—does it work on me? It’s after I have this basic idea, I try to test this track on myself. I try to imagine if the people are going to dance to it.

Let’s talk about your work with Neville Watson. Do you work face to face?

No. It’s a very interesting project. Actually we’ve worked together for two years and we hadn’t met for all this time. It’s very funny. When I released my first record on vinyl in 2005, I noticed he was playing it. I already knew of him as a DJ and a producer. A friend of mine from France booked him, and I saw a picture of him playing my first record. I thought it’s cool to send him an email to say thank you for the support. So we found that we had a passion of the old school sound, we thought it would be cool to make a track together.

So he sent a couple of sounds. I put the sounds into my software, added a bassline and a beat, and developed a track with his sounds. At that time we didn’t use Skype, we just used email to send the loops and discuss the music. We did this first track just as a joke. I put the track on MySpace, I didn’t offer it to any labels. And one day I added Rush Hour label on MySpace even though I hadn’t mailed them. I just added them as a friend. And half an hour later I had an email from them: “this first track on your player: is it available?” That’s how everything started.

“I would sacrifice a good
mix-down for a special sound.”

You’ve talked before about how you and Neville have a shared appreciation of old school house sounds. What do you think it is about these productions that excites you so much?

I’ve listened to house and techno since late ’91. So this specific sound is very deep in my heart. I was 12 years old when I started to listen to that kind of music, and it left a very big mark on me. I guess it’s very different if you start to listen to any kind of music when you are 20, or 18, and when you’re younger. I guess if I’d had the opportunity to make music or DJ at that age, I’d probably get over the old school sound and look for the new thing. But now I have the chance to release music, and I want to incorporate this music that I loved in the past and didn’t have the chance to make and to play in the past.

I wanted to talk a bit about your output over the past two years as you seem to put out a lot of records. Have you been inspired more over the past two years? Do you make a lot of music that isn’t released?

No, I don’t have anything lying on my hard drive. For the past two years, everything I have produced has been released. The thing is, I’ve been listening to electronic music for quite a long time, and I was struggling to start making music. Then I started to make music in 1999 or 2000. It took five years from the moment I had already completed production for release until I released my first record. So I was really struggling to get my music out. When I had some connections with smaller labels, I just had the desire to put out more and more music because I hadn’t had the chance to do it for so many years.

For the first couple of years I was producing, no one wanted to release my music. When I started making some connections, I promised everyone “yes, I am going to make a release for you.” At some point I gave so many promises, I had to catch up with it. I did too many tracks, I was too generous maybe. I wish I would make less, I wish I would spend more time with the production. That’s what I’m going to do from now on. Since I released my first records, it was never like I had ten tracks on the hard drive thinking who to sign the tracks [to]. There were always many labels asking me if I had a track. Since I made my first release I haven’t had a track standing on my hard drive.

KiNK jamming

I saw on your MySpace you were having some problems with your hearing. How is it at the moment?

Unfortunately it never got better, I have tinnitus. It’s ringing in my right ear. Fortunately, it’s very quiet, and it’s not a problem for my production or DJing. I only hear it in the evening when the computer is switched off, for example when I am in the bathroom and everything is quiet. But it’s a signal that something is very wrong with my ears. I’ve been to 20 doctors; I did some hearing tests that showed that my hearing is quite good for my age. But I have to be very careful from now on. I haven’t DJed for ten months. Now I’m DJing with custom-made earplugs.

How did you sustain the damage do you think?

I used to produce music on headphones. It’s completely wrong. It’s not good for the mixes; it’s not good for the ears. I knew it. But in the beginning when I started to make music, I didn’t have the money to buy normal speakers. I got used to making music on headphones. Later I had some monitors, but I hadn’t got used to making music on speakers. I continued to make music on headphones for ten years. I think that’s the reason.

One night I was finalizing a track, running it through a tape recorder. I wanted to hear the typical tape distortion on the hi-hats, which is the most harmful frequency for your ears. I was listening to those hi-hats for like two hours, just enjoying the great effect of the tape recording. And when I removed the headphones I heard this noise. It was horrible. But there is always something positive. Yes, I have this problem, and it will probably last forever. But from that point I stopped using headphones, I started to DJ with earplugs, and my ears are still in very good condition. The doctor said that I don’t have any hearing loss. So this condition I have will make me more careful, and keep my ears in better condition for longer.

Words / Ryan Keeling

Published / Fri, 18 Jun 2010

comment 6 Comments

Photo credits /

All Photos – Petar Cholakov

KiNK interview

James Ruskin – Blueprint (RA Label of the Month 1004 Mix)

download

RA

Label of the month: BlueprintQuality over quantity has been the guiding principle for this London techno label over the past decade, and it has been better than ever since its relaunch in 2009. RA delves into the history of James Ruskin’s Blueprint.There’s a lot of lip service paid to quality control among electronic musicians. Listen long enough to any label boss, and you’ll hear them bemoan imprints (never named, naturally) that are flooding the market. James Ruskin doesn’t bother complaining. But his actions betray him. In 14 years of operation, Blueprint has had a grand total of 29 official 12-inches. A few limited edition EPs, a small sublabel have added to the pile, but here we are in 2010. Still awaiting BP030.

It won’t be long, Ruskin assures us. In 2009, the London-based DJ/producer relaunched the imprint after a short hiatus. Since then, Blueprint has been releasing work at a breakneck pace. Four whole 12-inches in 12 months. Perhaps most surprising of all, the output came from names—O/V/R, Valmay, Mark Broom—never associated with Blueprint before. “The original idea for the label was a vehicle for Richard [Polson] and I,” Ruskin says. “What we were trying to achieve was very specific. We got sent a lot of demos—we got sent good demos—but they didn’t necessarily fit. Blueprint wasn’t about releasing music for the sake of releasing music. That’s why it remained around the core of people that were there at the beginning.”

Ruskin, Polson and Oliver Ho were the trio of producers that formed said core for much of Blueprint’s early history. And if it hadn’t been for an unsuccessful live show, Ho might have never joined the label at all. “Oliver was doing something with a friend, very rudimentary. It didn’t go overly well, but I heard something in what he was trying to create with the sounds—and the manipulations of those sounds. I asked if he had some material that he was working on for this label we were starting up, and that was it basically.”

Outline

Outline: Richard Polson and James Ruskin

The trio were among a small collection of producers in London that were breaking free of the prevailing techno sound of the time. “Underground Resistance was a huge inspiration. The lo-fi attitude was something that I was really drawn to.” It was a movement that was taking hold in places throughout the UK at the time, most notably in Birmingham. “I remember going to the record shop right before Blueprint started and picking up the early Downwards records. As soon as I heard them it was yeah, yeah. I related to the sounds, the way it was put together. It sounded right to me.”

With Ruskin and Polson teaming up in the studio under the name Outline, and Oliver Ho releasing under his own name, Blueprint soon had that aforementioned specific sound. “Could I put what that is into words? Probably not. But I can hear it. If I hear a track that I like but isn’t quite right for the label, I couldn’t necessarily tell you what’s missing….When it gets me, it gets me. And that’s that.”

That thing in the mid- to late-’90s for Ruskin and Polson was raw techno. Ho’s sound was “spikier, more dry” and the Outline releases were more “rounded-off,” claims the producer, but there was a clear throughline. It was a sensibility, but it was also a function of the machines that were used as well. The label began at an opportune moment for budding producers: The first wave of electronic music producers were getting rid of their machines, trading them in for newer gear. This meant that, if you looked hard enough, there were pieces of equipment starting to find their way into secondhand shops across the country.

“We had an incredibly limited amount of gear at home. An Akai S950, a very cheap effects unit and an old drum machine. That was literally it. We paid about 600 pounds for this sampler, which at the time was a big deal to us. We immersed ourselves in creating as much as we could at home, though, because we didn’t want to go in and rent studio time.” It was time well spent. When Ruskin and Polson did the test pressings for the first Blueprint release, they sent the results to Surgeon. A few days later, they received a call from the Birmingham DJ. He wanted to come down to London and stay for a while, to find out more about this similar aesthetic emerging in the capital city.

The Birmingham connection is an important one. Indeed, many people called the type of techno that emerged at the time “The Birmingham Sound.” There were enormous parties all throughout the UK, however, that began to cater to the appetite for the more aggressive side of things. London had Lost, Liverpool had Voodoo, Leeds had The Orbit. Birmingham’s taste for the stuff led to both House Of God and Atomic Jam. “It snowballed really quickly. We were embraced by the people that really enjoyed that kind of sound,” recalls Ruskin.

Blueprint releases

Soon, continental Europe found itself just as interested. Surgeon gained a residency at Berlin’s Tresor club, a tacit acknowledgment that there was techno emerging from places outside of Detroit that seemed just as vibrant. Ruskin often traveled to play with Surgeon there, and soon had his own relationship with the club and, perhaps just as importantly, the imprint of the same name. Ruskin ended up putting out a trio of full-lengths across the course of the ’00s.

The final album, The Dash, was released in 2008. It stands as perhaps his most diverse work, reflecting both a change in working methods and his outlook on life. Outline production partner and label co-manager Richard Polson left Blueprint in 1999, but the duo remained good friends until Polson tragically died in 2006. In an interview with Test last year, Ruskin admitted that the full-length was “created for Richard. I don’t like to use the word tribute as I don’t really know if that is the right way of describing it. It was definitely a process and a focus for me after he passed away and that helped me to deal with things.”

It’s clear that, despite the fact that Polson neither DJ’d nor had much interest in learning the nuts and bolts of production, that he had an enormous impact on the direction of Blueprint in its early days and UK techno in general. “Richard was very much the behind-the-scenes guy. He was very much about creating the vibe, he kept the feel of the project on target. It worked out really well. But then my schedule as a DJ started to take off and it became harder and harder to find the time.”

James Ruskin

Blueprint label boss James Ruskin

The allure of success, however, never exactly infected Ruskin to a degree that he couldn’t stop. “I wanted to step back for a bit [in 2006] and wanted to make sure that my next step was relevant. I was looking at what everyone else was up to, looking at how the scene was progressing…. I didn’t have the connection at the time with the studio and what was happening at the time to create music for the right reasons. And that’s always been very important to me. The creation of music to fit current perceptions of what is cool makes music a product.”

The distance gave time to Ruskin to reassess, to ensure that the music that came out under his own name—and under the Blueprint banner—wasn’t a mere product. Last year, the label reemerged with an EP from O/V/R, the first release of the new project from Ruskin and Birmingham techno producer Karl O’Connor (AKA Regis). It seemed like an obvious move. The duo had been working on the tracks for years together, and the music scene at the time was finally coming back to techno in a major way due to the work of labels like Ostgut Ton and Sandwell District, the latter of which O’Connor also records on regularly.

“I think there’s a wave of music being made at the moment that has a depth, a grit, a raw organic feel that wasn’t around for a few years. The sonic qualities of the stuff that is coming out on Ostgut, for instance, is really interesting to me.” The same goes for Valmay’s Radiated Future which emerged last year, perhaps the finest moment of Blueprint Mk. II. UK techno vet Paul Mac’s release fit neatly into the zeitgeist and yet stood eerily outside of it, sampling Charles Bukowski’s haunting, drunken poetry to frightening effect on the title track and finding room for expression in tempos slower than are traditionally associated with the imprint’s fast-paced textured techno on “Old Dog.”

Valmay will return in 2010 if all goes according to plan, as will O/V/R. Robert Hood, too, will make his Blueprint debut with a remix later in the year. And Ruskin is set to keep busy outside of Blueprint as well, with material forthcoming on Ostgut Ton and an upcoming remix of Planetary Assault Systems. Like those heady days in the mid- to late-’90s, there seems to be a self-sustaining scene forming around this type of techno once again. When the ebb inevitably happens again a few years down the road, though, your best bet will be to keep an ear open to Blueprint. Ruskin may have a tough time explaining what it’s composed of, but he knows quality when he hears it.

Blueprint

Blueprint mix

This month, our special label of the month mix is from Blueprint’s James Ruskin, with the label boss fitting some of his favorite tunes of past and present amongst a blistering selection of Blueprint material.

Download: RA Label of the Month 1004 Mix: Blueprint (right click + save target as)
Filesize: 115.4MB Length: 01:40:15

Tracklist
01. Unique 3 – Theme (Autechre Mix)
02. Silent Servant – Noise Modulation
03. Valmay – Distrust
04. Bauhaus – Bauhaus
05. Saint Etienne – Your Head My Voice (Aphex Twin Mix)
06. Vex’d – 3rd Choice
07. Marcel Dettman – Shift (Norman Nodge Remix)
08. Surgeon & James Ruskin – Sound Pressure
09. James Ruskin – Massk
10. James Ruskin – Graphic
11. James Ruskin – Lahaine (O/V/R Mix)
12. Gary Beck – Limehouse
13. Deadbeat / Fenin – Teach the Devil’s Son
14. Shlomi Aber – Create Balance
15. Autechre – Second Peng
16. Delta Funktionen – Silhouette (Marcel Dettman Remix)
17. DVS 1 – Departure
18. Polson & Ruskin – Institute for the Future
19. Planetary Assault System – GT (James Ruskin Remix)
20. Valmay – Old Dog
21. Portion Reform – Reduction
22. O/V/R – Fallen Night Renew
23. Marcel Dettmann – Unrest (Norman Nodge Remix)
24. Autechre – os veix3
25. Deepbass – Blackout
26. Lee Holman – Kawl
27. James Ruskin – Work (BP Mix)
28. Valmay – Radiated Future
29. James Ruskin – Sabre
30. Mark Broom & James Ruskin – Hostage
31. Lucy – Gmork (Luke Slater Remix)
32. Mark Broom & James Ruskin – The Metal Man
33. Sandwell District – LTD
34. Peter Van Hoesen – Terminal
35. Surgeon – The Crawling Frog Is Torn and Smiles
36. James Ruskin – Solution
37. O/V/R – Interior
38. James Ruskin – The Outsider (Luke Slater’s ME Remix)

Published / Thu, 08 Apr 2010

comment 34 Comments

Features

James Ruskin – Blueprint (RA Label of the Month 1004 Mix)

Chez Damier interview

Read interview

Chez Damier: A work in progress KMS, The Music Institute, Prescription: The Chicago legend has been through it all, but if his recent activity is any indication, he’s not done yet. In this in-depth interview, Chez Damier talks about his past, present and future with RA’s Dave Stenton.

Along with a couple of friends, Chez Damier opened The Music Institute in Detroit in the late ’80s. Every nascent music scene needs an outlet. And The Music Institute proved just as important for the development of techno in the city as The Warehouse and The Music Box had been for house music in Chicago a few years earlier.

Damier, AKA Anthony Pearson, could have stopped there, assured of a place in dance music history—albeit just a footnote. But, instead—and after a few years managing the KMS studio and label for Kevin Saunderson—he returned to his hometown of Chicago and, alongside Ron Trent, created a musical legacy deserving of an entire chapter. Between 1993 and 1995, the first 15 releases on the pair’s Prescription label—widely regarded as one of the finest house imprints ever—crafted the blueprint for what would become known as deep house. And 15 years later the tracks they created together as Chez N Trent—most notably “Morning Factory,” “Sometimes I Feel Like,” “The Choice” and “Be My”—remain unparalleled examples of the genre.

When seemingly at the height of their powers, however, musical differences put paid to the partnership. Trent took sole control of Prescription and, for a year or so, Damier focused on the sub-label, Balance, before taking an extended break from the music industry. A handful of releases in 2004 and the odd DJ date hinted that a return was on the cards. But conclusive proof only came in 2009 when Damier committed to a series of releases for the German label Mojuba, as well as launching his own new project, Balance Alliance.

RA spoke to Chez prior to his recent DJ appearance at new London party, Lost In The Loft. The conversation covers his early clubbing experiences in Chicago, the development and subsequent breakdown of his relationship with Ron Trent and how, after so long out of the game, he is coping in an industry that has undergone widespread change.

You had a pretty early start in the music industry, working part-time in a Chicago record store from the age of 11. When did you first start experiencing the city’s clubs?

At age 13, which was 1980 and ’81.

Let’s focus on that period. What was it like?

Most of my experience came from people who were behind [the bigger names in terms of status]. I was taken [to clubs] by a lot of people who were artists, fashion designers, hair stylists, DJs like Craig Loftis who was behind Frankie Knuckles. I would cut his hair every Friday [so that’s how we became friends] and it was a really, really wild start for me. In Chicago, the difference between how we see house music now and then is that it was a lifestyle then.

Much more like hip-hop?

Exactly, [you could tell us] by our haircuts, by our clothes. We went from preppy to house. It was almost like that whole thing of being identified, you know, with the really pretty girls, the guys with their haircuts, you know, fashionable? So, for us, it was a culture. We really looked forward to going out—from the high school arena through to the more underground arena—we really looked forward to going out to this event, it was [just] our nature.

But I often find myself questioning people’s experience [of that period]. Although I don’t claim to be an expert I can literally say that I’ve witnessed quite a bit. And when I say witnessed I don’t mean hearsay, I mean that I was actually there. I hear some stories and some people’s interpretation of it and I think, “That’s all wrong.”

Here’s the challenge. We’re sitting facing one another. So it’s impossible for us to see the same thing. But we’re in the same room! We can agree we’re in the same room. We can agree that we’re seeing some of the same things but we cannot say that we’re seeing it from the same angle. And so this is what I have a problem with when it comes to most of the articles and documentaries and other things that I read [about the history of house music]. I think, “Yes, OK, you’ve added [some] value but that was [only] one perspective of it.” But what you don’t know is that there’s a whole other perspective on it.

People seldom mention Herb Kent who, to me, was the father of it all. He was the one that could play disco at the same time as the B-52s and totally educate me—I didn’t know who the B-52s were [before that]—who can give you punk rock and disco and Italo all in the same breath. These were the people that changed my life. [But people] want to say, “It came from this kind of underground black gay club,” which is not a problem—and I’m not taking anything away from that—but there was always something parallel happening. And when I went to the white gay clubs that were promoting the British invasion: The Thompson Twins, the whole Sheffield sound as well as Italo [disco]. And these other urban kids were also experiencing that, but they were combining it with disco and [putting] their interpretation on it. So I get so confused when I get into the whole [history of it].

The Music InstituteChez Damier and The Music Institute

The Music Institute opened in 1987. It was me, Alton Miller and George Baker. We were all 21. We were motivated by Chicago and New York—and the lack of [comparable clubs in] Detroit. So, here I was from Chicago, George had just come from FIT [Fashion Institute of Technology] in New York and so he was experiencing the Paradise Garage; I had experience of the Warehouse [in Chicago]; and we both kinda got to the Detroit scene and it was all about how do we reproduce this feeling [that we had experienced in other cities]?

What a lot of people don’t know is that the Music Institute would originally have been called The Gate, and would have been at another location in Detroit, on the college campus. That building was an old automotive garage and we found the building and it had a ramp that went up to it, and George was so inspired by New York that he said, “This is so Paradise Garage, this is what we gotta do,” and so we got the place and started renovating and it was all exposed brick and we found that we were gonna need a boiler system.

So we lost [that venue] and had a short time to find another place. [Then] we found the owners of the Music Institute building and they were willing to work with us for little or nothing. It was a four-story building and [although] we [only] used the first two floors we had the whole building. It was unoccupied in downtown Detroit and we went there and made a proposal and, from that point, it was just friends of ours [who] loaned us money. The music store [also] loaned us the sound system so we were really, really fortunate.

We had a party right around the corner before it opened called Back To Basics but we didn’t see the kids that we wanted to see [at the party] because Detroit was very segregated into white, black, straight and gay. But George and I, because we were very cultured, we wanted the international combination crowd ‘cos we never saw it [in Detroit]. So we did a party and said we were gonna salute some of the great DJs. And we were hoping that the Ken Colliers, Larry Levans—all these DJs who we had [referenced] on the flyer—would draw people who had heard of them. And it worked. And it was a packed party and we went all the way to 6 AM. And that was it. We were saying, “We’re here, let’s go for it.” And that was really the pushing point. Also, when we opened it, it just so happened that techno was hitting the first wave. And we worked [the bookings] out so that Friday nights—with Derrick, Juan and Darryl Wynn, who we knew personally—were called Next Generation and Saturday, which was me and Alton, was Back To Basics.

We closed in 1989. Which is why the recent Music Institute 20th Anniversary 12-inches came out last year. They are [being released by] Kai Alce who actually at the time was a 16-year-old preppy kid who was my light boy [at the Music Institute]. He made a deal with me that if I trained him [to DJ] on Sundays he would treat me to lunch. That was the deal. We had this place that we would go to in Detroit that had all the beers from around the world and we would go there on Sundays after a DJ session and we would drink different beers from around the world. That was my pay. But I didn’t know he was underage and therefore it produced a whole other problem with his mum and that whole thing! [laughs] He lied to me and told me he was 18 years old, but he was 16.

People want a nice neat story.

But there isn’t a nice neat story! And I’ve heard the same thing about Detroit and the same thing about New York. And I can’t vouch for New York the same way I can for Detroit, but I visited Detroit about five years before I moved there and was introduced to the Ken Colliers and Greg Colliers who were the fathers of dance music [in the city] at the time and I’m thinking, when I hear stories coming out of Detroit now, and I was there at the beginnings of the Derrick Mays and the Kevin Saundersons, and what I saw and what they saw, ah, it was very different. But, again, I can’t legitimately say they didn’t see it. [All] I can say legitimately [is that] I did. How about that? [laughs]

Presumably you’ve read books like Last Night a DJ Saved My Life and seen DVDs such as Maestro and, clearly, you have some issues with them. But are any better than others in terms of telling the story of house music?

You know what? I think they all tell part of the story. But I think it’s very unfair to conclude that that is the story.

It’s not definitive.

Yeah, and that’s the problem that I have. And I’ll tell you another thing I have a problem with: people not giving [due credit to] New York and the so-called “European invasion.” To me that was the electronic music before it became house and techno. I get confused when, all of a sudden, the 909 entered into the picture, and the 808 entered into the picture and all of a sudden it’s like, “OK we [should] label this thing.” And that’s fine, but it’s almost like Columbus saying “I discovered America.” OK Columbus, you did discover America, but America was already America; you just gave it a name. And this is the problem I have with the whole rivalry: what is this and what is that? I think New York was [already] doing it underground. And Europe was [already] doing it underground. And they were doing it well because this was a generation that was coming from the disco arena and they were creating what they only knew at the time as dance music.

So the importance of Chicago and Detroit to contemporary dance music has been overly elevated?

I think it’s been more than overly elevated. I think it’s totally [out of proportion]. You know when I moved to Detroit it was about as dead as this room right now and I was partying with [both] the gay kids and the straight kids and, to be quite honest with you, there was nothing happening. The downtown was [a] ghost town. It just amazes me how [people] fight over being a “Godfather”, being a “Godson,” you know, being a “Creator.” I hate when people make it so final; to say this word is the word. So that’s why you never really hear me talk about it [definitively]. This is the first or maybe second time I’ve really been passionate about actually speaking about it because I’m at a point right now where I look back [and think] I was just a patron and, as a patron, I didn’t catch it like that. [laughs]

You became closely involved in Detroit’s underground music scene but you initially moved there to study, right?

I actually moved to East Lansing, Michigan. Funnily enough that’s where Kevin [Saunderson] and those guys were living, but I didn’t know them then. So I was there for a while and then a friend of mine who I would visit in Detroit said, “Why don’t you come to Detroit?” And I thought, “OK.” And I went down to Detroit and that changed my life forever.

How did your involvement in the Detroit underground scene come about?

Well, initially I was still trying to get into communication [at the University of Michigan] so I worked for the first pager company—beeper company—in Detroit and I came in and started working as a mobile operator. I was the guy who when the big phones—the big car phones—[first became available and people] would call from their car phone and I would patch them to [the recipient]. And working there introduced me to the security guard, Thomas Barnett. I used to have to be there early in the morning and Thomas would be the security guard overnight so we would talk. And he would say, “You know I wanna do music,” or “I’m doing music” and we got into this whole thing and I said, “Oh, you know I met these guys, and his name is Derrick, and he does music…” And I hooked them up with each other and that was the birth of Rhythim is Rhythim.

So you’d met Derrick before that?

Me and Derrick met through a friend of mine; actually it’s so strange how it happened: I met Alton Miller and Derrick May in the same week. A friend of mine knew somebody who was doing electronic music and he introduced me to Derrick and then I met Alton as they both were friends and we all just became good friends. So then Derrick introduced me to Juan and he introduced me to Kevin Saunderson.

And that was when, ’86, ’87?

’87 and ’88.

Wow, so after that it all happened pretty quickly. Were you working at KMS right from its inception?

No. Kevin Saunderson had just started it and I was attempting to work on my first [musical] project [Just A Matter of Time] with my producer at the time, Al Maalik. And so he went to Kevin, who was working on his first label, I think he had [only] done “Rock to the Beat” [at the point] or maybe “Triangle of Love,” only one or two records. Al wanted to do a compilation called Techno-1 and he introduced the project and Kevin wanted to put it out. Now that I look back on it I’m just amazed at how it happened: here I have Eddie Fowlkes recording me, here I have Juan Atkins mixing me, and here I have Carl Craig remixing me, and Kevin Saunderson executive producing me. It was just like, “Woah.” And so I’m looking back and saying, “That was really amazing.” [At the time] I was working on the Music Institute and Kevin came and asked [if I] would do some A&R for him. And that’s how I ended up [working] with him.

You did some writing for Inner City, correct? What exactly was your role?

I wrote “Set Your Body Free” off their first album: I constructed the melodies, the hook and the lyrics for the song.

Had you had any formal musical training?

None at all. I was self-taught. I hung around bands, of course, but never formally trained. I had musicians in my family but I was never really inspired by that, to be quite honest with you. I’m still not. What inspired me was that I’m very psychological so it was all about, “How do I take this feeling that I’ve experienced [on dance floors] and [re]produce it [as a piece of music].” And that’s still what happens [with me] today: it has nothing to do with how great or not I am as a musician. It’s, “How can I produce this feeling that makes me want to dance that hopefully makes other people want to dance?” That’s my whole philosophy behind it. I don’t pretend I’m some guru, or deep person, who’s studied how to do this. I’m an inspired artist; and inspired artist means simply that if I’m not inspired, nothing’s happening.

“I hate when people make it so final;
to say this word is the word.”

Ron TrentRon Trent, Chez Damier’s famed production partner.

So you were releasing records on KMS as well as managing the label and studio during the early-’90s. When did that come to an end, prompting you to move back to Chicago?

Actually, how it worked out is that I ended up moving to New York to do KMS New York and in the process of doing that we [were] just in over our heads because markets were beginning to change. So we had to close the New York office and while that was going on I came back to Detroit for a moment and, on a visit to Chicago, met Ron Trent.

How exactly did you and Ron meet?

Well there’s this guy Carl Bias, who’s largely unknown but a very intricate ingredient to the early Chicago scene. He and I were friends. And he and Ron were friends. And he said, “I gotta introduce you!” So one day me and him went by Ron’s place and that was it. From that day on it was just amazing.

And the first releases you produced together were for KMS?

Actually that’s just the way it worked out [in terms of timings]. We were preparing for Prescription at the same time. The only projects we did together for KMS were “The Choice” and “Don’t Try It.” Actually, our first production together was [a remix of] Inner City’s “Share My Life.”

What did you see in Ron, or what did you see in each other, that made you think, “We can work together”?

I think that the relationship Ron and I had was probably one of the most special, authentic relationships that anyone could ever have. There was so much excitement when we met each other. First of all the ingredient, in my opinion, which made me and Ron “me and Ron” was the laughter we had. We spent so much time laughing. Maybe we were just being silly but we would laugh about things and we had this [shared] ideology about how we heard things, how we saw it. We agreed to disagree [at times] but really it was just the laughter that made us work.

Did the two of you have prescribed roles in the studio?

Well when Ron and I met, Ron was working for Clubhouse [Records] out of Chicago and I had just released KMS049. That was our meeting point. So there weren’t actually [prescribed roles]. We came in and it depended on how we were feeling. That set the tone: Ron had his style and I had my style. I like to describe me and Ron as Ron being more laidback and me the more energy/aggressive [side of things]. So I guess, at that point, we were just trying to find a happy medium. A meeting point. And what we got was a meeting point. I think that, if you hear us individually, you can hear the meeting point; [when we were] apart from each other Ron was a fairly decent keyboardist but you can hear the difference and the energy. So when we came together that was the magic, because you had that kind of intense versus mellow combination actually happening.

USA DJ

Countless house DJs cite Prescription as their all-time favourite label. Did you have any idea, at the time, that the label would have such a legacy?

None whatsoever. One of the things that changed mine and Ron’s lives collectively was when I took him to New York: I took him to New York to the Sound Factory—and I think that was the first time he had been since he was a kid ‘cos I think he was originally born in New York—and we went and when we came back we ended up writing “Be My” and the whole “I Wouldn’t” project. It was just something about experiencing [the] kids dancing, [the] sound systems [in New York] that was really intriguing to us.

And Ron—if you’ve ever met him—is very into what something sounds like whereas me, on the other hand, I’m more into the feel; my signature would be the feel of the dance floor whereas I think his would be the sound of the dance floor. I don’t know [exactly] how to identify it. Sometimes you want to put a name to something to identify it. But there are some things we don’t know. I’m using this as a metaphor to try and explain that Ron had a taste of Chicago, I had my Detroit experience, and both of us went through the New York experience and so we had a little different perspective than someone who was just from Chicago, or just from Detroit, or just from New York.

You were pulling from all three equally?

Exactly. And I think that’s what made it magic for us. You couldn’t hear us and say, “That’s Chicago,” or “That’s Detroit,”or, “That’s New York.” I think if you listened to our projects you’ll hear an element of each—and even an international influence because that’s what made it work.

What’s amazing looking back is that, the first ten Prescription records, from “The Wanderer” through to “I Remember Dance,” were all released in search a short period of time. Another interesting aspect is that, aside from the logo, there’s no uniform identity—the artwork for each release is different. Was that deliberate?

Yes. It was my adventures in marketing. Even the no name thing: when I did the KMS—the no name track—I thought it was clever marketing. And [when] we came along to do the Prescription thing I thought it would also be clever marketing because I thought it was [a] way to give each release its own identity. And because it was underground we could do that. I was rebelling against the system. [laughs] The system was to conform. And we were not gonna conform. We wanted to create something. Then of course Balance [a Prescription sub-label] came out and I guess that [did] conform [to some extent].

Prescription records

From left to right:
PRES110: I Remember Dance
PRES000: The Wanderer
PRES101: Be My / I Wouldn’t
PRES105: Love Is The Message (For Those Who Didn’t Hear It)
PRES107: Hip To Be Disillusioned Vol. 1

Can you pick a favourite from the Prescription catalogue?

[laughs] I can’t pick a favourite. I mean all of them have so many roots to stories. Actually, it would probably be “Be My (Friend).” Well “Love Is the Message” and “Be My (Friend).” And “Sometimes I Feel Like.” But then I have to keep on going! [laughs] But the reason for choosing “Be My (Friend)” is that was the first project we worked on after coming back to KMS from New York, so that was very, very special.

The Prescription “family” then grew to include other artists.

Me and Ron had different ideas about what the label should be like. And that would end up dividing us. I personally went to New York to spend some time with Romanthony [in order] to get the Wanderer project. That was the first Prescription. It was a way of setting the tone, of saying to people, “You know what, we’re not [just] about ourselves.” That was my intention. And since I was handling that part of what we were doing, that was my message; my message was, “I’m going to get someone”—and I knew Azuli had him [Romanthony], and I knew he had his own Black Male [label] —but I just thought that I could set such a different tone. And the version I chose of “The Wanderer” was just completely unexpected, I think. I did not want a label that [just] revolved around me. But it didn’t work out that way [in the end]. Ron would probably have preferred it to be more “us.” I didn’t. And so, to me, that was a big, big difference. So we split up and said, “OK, you take Prescription and I’ll take Balance” and, of course, then you didn’t see Balance for a long, long time. But now you see Balance coming back and what you’re going to see is the conclusion of what was intended from the start. And I think we’ve seen, from where Ron has taken Prescription, where he ultimately wanted to take it.

The split you agreed—Ron taking care of Prescription, you taking care of Balance—sounds fairly amicable. But presumably it was still tough?

We speak now. But it was a painful break-up. I’m able to talk about it now but it was a painful relationship break-up because there were so many dynamics: me and Ron lived together; we were production partners; and we also had a business together. That was a lot of each other. And we became so tight and when you spend so much time together—every day—and you travel together, it was a bit much.

We talk today and we’ve talked on several occasions about getting back together to do some things but I think I allowed Ron to be Ron and I need to be Chez right now. I’m not really in a rush to be anything [other] than me; I’m just really exercising who I am as a person and an artist. And I’m OK by that [for the time being]. When we do come together if we can still go back to the basic elements—and we still laugh with each other today—we will have something that we like.

So you’re confident you will record together again; it’s just a matter of time?

I’m fairly confident it will happen.

“My greatest fear in the world
is that people think that I
haven’t grown [as an artist].”

From 1997, when the Balance label came to an end, up until 2004, you went off the radar in terms of releases. Were you still DJing?

No.

Why was that?

Times had changed. I just had a new world that I was living. I was a soon-to-be-husband. It wasn’t about me anymore. Even more so. It just changed how I saw things and how I saw life. I mean I don’t know how many people handle things well, but here I am, as a party kid, dancing before the Knuckles and the Ron Hardys and the Dave Morales and the Farley Keiths and all these icons. And then to be a part of the revolution coming out of Detroit. I think there’s some after effects that happen [if you experience that]; I think you grow really quickly and I don’t think there’s ever really time to think about it. And I needed to [take time out and] find me in it. Before I was just kinda living it. I was on the road and living the life but I didn’t know who I was.

The music industry underwent huge changes during the ’97-’04 period when you weren’t releasing records. When you returned, how big an effect did that have on you personally?

Actually, it hasn’t [affected me]. I understand the marketplace because I’ve always been in the marketplace. It’s like a business person working in one line of business and then working in another line of business: he realises the fundamentals are the same. To me, I play the vinyl game now. But I play the vinyl game because I believe these are the last days of vinyl—and the last days could last another 100 years. But, to me, vinyl is intangibility. Vinyl says, “I was here [in] 2009.” Digital doesn’t say that. Digital says, “I have something available but, if your hard drive crashes [it’s gone].” Vinyl is like a book. Because it was never about making money in the first place, I can now have fun again doing the vinyl bit and leave the digital to those who wanna take it and make it into an empire. I have no intentions of making music into an empire.

You have two outlets at the moment: Balance Alliance and Mojuba.

The Mojuba label is the label that Chez Damier is exclusively with. Balance Alliance is the executive producer of Anthony Pearson. That’s the distinction: I don’t have to worry about Chez on Balance Alliance.

KMS recently repressed several Chez Damier and Chez N Trent releases, apparently without your consent?

How do I put it? I think it all goes back to motive: I don’t know what Kevin’s motive was. I don’t have a problem—and I let him have all the [original] proceeds anyway, I never got a dime off him, ‘cos I was loyal to him—if the motive is to launch KMS back up as a company. I don’t have a problem with that. But give us some new shit. Give us KMS 2010. Then there’s no problem. But when you do it, and you do it as a rehash, so it seems that my career is treading water, then I have a problem with it.

I guess it could impact on sales of your Mojuba and Balance Alliance releases?

I’m sure those in the know will be able to distinguish [between] the two. But I find it very disturbing. Although, on the other hand: it is promotion. So I either have to take it and make it work for me. Or I sit back and complain. So I’ll take it and make it work for me.

My greatest fear in the world is that people think that I haven’t grown [as an artist]. I don’t ever want to be at the point where people say, “He’s still where he used to be.” I don’t want to be there. I want you to say, “Wow, he’s got a different head now,” or “He’s somewhere else now.” For example, I was in Glasgow last week and people wanna talk about “when.” And I don’t even remember “when.” I’m the kinda person that, once I live it, it’s over. But people keep reminding you, “You remember ‘Can You Feel It?'” And I’m thinking, “Oh my God, that’s so not where I’m at now.” But then the other side is that I’m thankful: I have a great gratitude to them for their appreciation but I’m so far away from that [time]. Maybe some people get off on it? But I don’t. I hate anything that prevents me from growing.

Words / Dave Stenton

Published / Wed, 06 Jan 2010

comment 6 Comments

Photo credits /

Header – Bowl Rider

Chez Damier interview